International Actuaries Address Concerns over Profession's
Integrity and Credibility
MONTRÉAL, Pq.—The actuarial profession in several
countries is developing new rules and standards to affirm its integrity
and competence to the public, attendees of the 2004 Casualty Actuarial
Society Annual Meeting were told here during the general session,
"Actuaries and Actuarial Issues Around the World."
Speaking at the CAS Annual Meeting, representatives of actuarial
associations from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United
States reported on efforts to strengthen the public's confidence in the
profession.
Concerns about the actuarial profession's responsibility to the
public have been generated recently by the financial problems of major
insurers in Australia and the United Kingdom and criticism of the
quality of actuarial opinions in the United States.
Mary Frances Miller, president of the CAS, said that the
organization's board is looking at ways to improve the credibility of
the profession, particularly with regards to doubts about the adequacy
of stated loss reserves. She pointed out that observers of the
property/casualty insurance industry and users of p/c insurance company
financial statements have expressed significant doubts about the
adequacy of stated loss reserves.
Miller said the CAS Board identified a number of initiatives that
are under consideration, including increasing the experience
requirement for signing a statutory opinion, requiring the actuary to
meet regularly with the company's audit committee (with or without
management), requiring the audit committee to get an outside opinion,
and having the signing actuary certify his or her opinion to the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Other suggestions, including requiring peer review, developing a
public track record of opinion signers, and triggering an automatic
Actuarial Board for Counseling and Discipline (ABCD) investigation when
development exceeds a threshold are intended to "provide more backbone
to the actuary," she said.
Graham E. Rogers, president of the Institute of Actuaries of
Australia, reported that the collapse of the HIH Insurance Group and a
subsequent government investigation raised issues for the actuarial
profession, that resulted in waysto enhance the standing of the profession and raise public awareness of
the actuary's role.
"The actuarial profession is in the spotlight," said Rogers. "There
are key issues concerning the proper and timely use of actuarial
advice, and the public interest responsibility of actuaries."
Rogers said that the Royal Commission investigating the failure of
HIH, the largest casualty insurer in Australia, identified
under-reserving by the company as the major reason behind the collapse.
Rogers said that in his examination of the company's failure to heed
actuarial advice, the government's chief investigator wondered: "Did
anyone stand back and ask themselves the simple question—Is this
right?"
He said that in the wake of HIH, the profession in Australia
launched a review of corporate governance standards for the profession.
These efforts include independent peer review of the actuary's work and
improving support for actuaries in meeting disclosure duties and
responsibilities.
Harvie Brown, president of the Faculty of Actuaries in the United
Kingdom, pointed out that many of the same issues involving the
actuarial profession had arisen in the wake of serious financial
problems with guaranteed annuities sold by Equitable Life Insurance
Company (UK). A government investigation into the company led to an
independent review of the actuarial profession.
The profession responded with several initiatives it had been
considering. One involved the revalidation of professional competence
through continuing professional education and practicing certificates.
"It is no longer acceptable just to have passed exams," said Brown.
"The profession must demonstrate to the public that actuaries are also
keeping themselves up to date."
To protect against conflicts of interest, an Independent Actuarial
Standards Board, operating separately from the professional governing
bodies, has been proposed to establish codes of professional conduct
and ethics as well as technical standards.
The proposed board will set well-defined criteria for standards,
identify when new or revised standards are required, and maintain an
oversight and scrutiny of the process, but will not draft the
standards, said Brown. Establishment of the standards will involve wide
consultation, not just with actuaries, but others involved.
Meeting the public's expectations of the profession is a similar
challenge for Canadian actuaries, said Brian FitzGerald, president,
Canadian Institute of Actuaries. "The Institute holds the duty of the
profession to the public above the needs of the profession to its
members," he said.
He observed that all actuarial organizations have rules of
professional conduct and requirements for continuing education, and
operate counseling and discipline systems.
FitzGerald identified several issues confronting Canadian actuaries.
"One is the question of what input we should seek from people outside
the profession," he said. "While we have sought advice from
nonactuaries and consulted with outside organizations when developing
standards, we have not had the practice of having them sit on our
councils and committees," FitzGerald said. He said that the
organization is discussing the addition of outsiders to its practice
standards council and possibly its committee on professional conduct.
FitzGerald said there is an effort under way to strengthen ways of
developing standards of practice. "We do not have an independent
standard-setting board, but I suspect there could be one in the
future."
Robert E. Wilcox, president, American Academy of Actuaries, agreed
that there will be "significant change in the way we practice and the
standards of practice."
The Academy is considering steps to enhance the Actuarial Standards
Board and the ABCD's independence by incorporating them separately and
adding nonactuaries to selected committees, who would provide advice
and vet standards before they are finalized.
In addition, the U.S. profession is considering an exposure draft of
a new and expanded qualification standard. This is due to concerns
expressed about the level of continuing professional development credit
required for those signing statements of actuarial opinion, and how it
compares with other professions as well as to actuaries in other
countries.